Search
Search plants, projects, owners, and states
Search plants, projects, owners, and states
225 MW Natural Gas Fired Combined Cycle (165 MW) + Natural Gas Fired Combustion Turbine (60 MW) operating in Placer, CA
225 MW
Nameplate Capacity
5
Generators
units
Hybrid (2)
Technology
Natural Gas Fired Combined Cycle + Natural Gas Fired Combustion Turbine
2007
Operating Since
Coordinates
38.7928, -121.3811
County
Placer, CA
Nearby Plants
Forward-looking, asset-specific exposure analytics combining climate hazards, generation variability, and counterparty risk into a single decision-grade view. Powered by InfraRisk.
See the full risk decomposition + scenarios for this asset.
| Field | EIA | GEM | Wikidata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator | City of Roseville - (CA) | City of Roseville - (CA) | — |
| Owner(s) | California Dept. of Water Resources, City of Roseville - (CA) | City of Roseville - (CA) | — |
| Status | Operating | — | — |
Roseville Energy Park is a 225 MW hybrid power plant located in Placer County, California. The plant, which began operating in 2007, is owned and operated by the City of Roseville. It utilizes both natural gas-fired combined cycle and natural gas-fired combustion turbine technologies across its five generators. Roseville Energy Park operates within the Balancing Authority of Northern California (BANC) and the Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC) NERC region. It is ranked as the 47th largest power plant in California out of 76, and 726th nationally out of 945.
In its most recent year of operation, Roseville Energy Park generated 461,905 MWh of electricity, achieving a capacity factor of 23.4%. The plant is the subject of 10 news articles, with coverage spanning industry trends, grid operations, and regulatory matters.
Generated from EIA, GEM, and public data sources
Grid Region
California (non-ISO)
Market
WEIM Participant
NERC Region
WECC — Western Electricity Coordinating Council
Balancing Authority
Balancing Authority of Northern California (BANC)
Grid Voltage
60.0 kV
Regulatory Status
RE — Regulated
Entity Type
Municipal
Sector
Electric Utility
Monthly net generation as reported to EIA-923 — useful for historical context. Confidence varies sharply by fuel type; the band above and the “About this data” button explain the caveats specific to this plant and how InfraSure’s in-house model handles them.
75 MWh
Latest Month
461.9K MWh
Annual Generation
23.4%
Capacity Factor
Forward-looking generation outlook with probabilistic ranges across weather, demand, and policy scenarios. Powered by InfraSure's generation modeling stack.
See the full forecast + scenario decomposition for this asset.
CO₂ Intensity
987 lb/MWh
NOx
0.053 lb/MWh
SO₂
0.005 lb/MWh
CH₄
0.019 lb/MWh
N₂O
0.002 lb/MWh
Capacity Factor
17.4%
Annual Net Gen
344 GWh
CO₂eq
988 lb/MWh
Subregion
WECC California
2013
$965/kW
Est. Construction Cost
Total estimated cost: $217.2M
Forward revenue, DSCR bands, and refinancing risk projected under price, demand, and policy scenarios. Powered by InfraSure's asset cashflow stack.
See the full revenue + DSCR projection for this asset.
This plant's balancing authority participates in CAISO's Western Energy Imbalance Market (WEIM). Direct nodal pricing data is not yet available.
No wholesale contracts disclosed in FERC EQR for this plant.
FERC EQR captures bilateral wholesale energy + capacity contracts ≥$1M/yr filed quarterly by jurisdictional sellers — covers renewable PPAs, thermal energy sales agreements, capacity contracts, and tolling agreements alike. Many plants don't appear: regulated-utility output flows to ratepayers via cost-of-service rather than bilateral contracts; small projects fall below the filing threshold; tax-equity-financed renewables route offtake to investors not utilities; merchant plants sell into ISO clearing markets without bilateral contracts. News-extracted buyer facts (below) may surface contracts disclosed only through announcements.
Last updated 2026-03-26
View all articlesNo Ask reports yet for this entity.
Ask about Roseville Energy ParkForward forecasts, scenario decomposition, and risk-decision tooling for this asset.